Response to Navaiera's commemorative speech

Navaiera decided to commemorate the King of Pop: Michael Jackson.  This was a bold choice, as there are many mixed opinions about him, his music, and his character.  Her personal connection to the honoree was integrated throughout the speech, much of it anecdotal; I liked this approach because it made the audience view things her way.  Not only did Navaiera talk about his professional accomplishments (which were many: changed the music industry with his special effects, dance moves and choreography, bridged the race gap by being the first black mega-music-star...etc), but she also spoke about his personal attributes.  These personal qualities included humanitarian acts ("heal the world," donating money..), dealing with his skin lightening medical condition, and the creation of Neverland where underpriveledged children could go to play.  I enjoyed Navaiera's enthusiasm during this speech; her gestures, tone of voice, everything, were conducive to effectively portraying Michael Jackson as a commendable figure. 

Response to Luke's commemorative speech

Luke chose to commemorate the organization called Teen Challenge, a program that changes lives, relieving addiction, by demonstrating and instilling Biblical principles (referred to as the "Jesus factor").  Spiritual growth was identified as the only way for suffering individuals to experience a sustained recovery.  The program does more than help overcome addictions; the Biblical principles can be applied in all aspects of life, giving hope, learning to take responsibilities for their actions, restoring relationships, and reestablishing lives.  Citing the success of several "graduates" was a good decision, as this strengthened the audience's ability to see this program, which many of us had never before heard of, as commendable and worthy of our respect and admiration.  The only critique I have to offer Luke is that he should have established his personal connection with the program more thoroughly; I think it was not until the question/answer session when we were able to get these answers.

Reflection: Commemorative speech

12/06/2011

           

For this speech, I chose to commemorate the Peace Corps.  I have been entertaining the idea of joining the program for several years and had already felt that I had a decent knowledge base from which I could begin forming ideas for my speech.  Additional research would be beneficial not only for the speech, but also for helping me to continuing shaping my own opinion of the organization and how/if it would be a good fit for me.

When writing my speech, I found the homework assignment that had been assigned to be helpful; unfortunately it took me awhile to think to focus on it, so I failed to touch upon some of the valuable tips in my speech.  The assignment had forced me to apply the principles in the handbook to actual commemorative pieces.  I think that it would have been a valuable assignment if applied to all of the speeches that we have done this semester (probably would have pushed students to use the handbook for more than just the quizzes…potentially could replace quizzes, which would leave extra class time).  From the assignment, I focused on amplifying the virtues of the Peace Corps and tried to establish my personal “relationship” with the program (although I think I failed because the first question asked of me was if I had ever considered joining…I had stated early in the speech that I had and that that was why I felt qualified to deem the Peace Corps commendable).  If I could go back and rewrite my speech, I would have chosen more powerful success story examples, to more strongly unify my audience into feeling a common, impressive sentiment toward the Peace Corps.  I think this issue limited the effectiveness of my speech; I didn’t really feel a moment of connection with my audience, which leads me to believe that it was not a very memorable speech.

I chose to speak on the first speaking day this time.  During my presentation, I felt no pulsing of my heart for the first time; I was unaware of any fidgeting and felt no nerves!  It was a great feeling of comfort.  I am not sure if I appeared more confident, but my lack of physical nerves made me feel more self-assured, which is what really matters; I’m sure one day my outward presentation will reflect my inner composure.

*side note*

Professor Fjelstad,
I just realized that you probably didn't notice this, but I want to let you know that my first 2 response blogs are under my first post as "comments"...I couldn't figure out how to make a new post for a while....hope this helps my blog grade!

Response to Kingsley's persuasive speech (skept)

Kingsley urged the audience to consider what we buy and where our food comes from.  He showed us that it is possible to buy local on a budget, and proved it by investigating and comparing prices of staple food items at a typical grocery store and at a farm stand.  The audience concerns here would have been cost (local foods tend to be more expensive) and convenience.  But Kingsley showed us that the prices are not significantly higher--so, for example, factory eggs may cost $1.19 and free range eggs may cost $2 or $3.  He demonstrated that the benefits of buying local outweigh the perceived convenience and cost issues; buying local serves to boost the local economy, allows a connection between farmer and consumer (know where it is coming from and how it is treated...notes that there have been recalls on factory-made eggs and beef...), and is generally the healthier option (grocery store options have chemicals, high fructose corn syrup...), which could potentially cut down future health issues/costs.  What I found to be the most persuasive aspect of the speech was the fact that Kingsley actually went out to the store and farm stand to do the price investigations himself.  This made him more credible as a speaker.